# Revenue Model

#### **1. Cost of Money In vs. Cost of Money Charged Out (Net Interest Margin)**

This is the core revenue source for the platform, leveraging the difference between the rate of return offered to investors and the rate charged to borrowers.

**Revenue Structure**

* **Cost of Money In:** Investors receive **8%–12% p.a.**, depending on the asset class and risk profile.
* **Cost of Money Charged Out:** Borrowers are charged **15%–20% p.a.**, reflecting the premium for early-stage project financing and tokenized finance options.
* **Net Margin:** The platform retains the difference, typically around **5%–8% p.a.**.

**Example Calculation**

* Total capital deployed = **$500M**.
* Average cost of money in = **10%**.
* Average cost of money charged out = **18%**.
* Net margin = **8% of $500M = $40M annually**.

#### **2. Upfront Finance Fees**

MAIV charges borrowers a percentage of the total capital raised as an upfront fee, compensating for due diligence, onboarding, and project structuring.

**Revenue Structure**

* Typical fee range = **1%–3% of the total capital raised**.
* This is a one-time fee per project but is a significant contributor, especially for large-scale funding.

**Example Calculation**

* Total capital raised in a year = **$500M**.
* Average fee = **2%**.
* Revenue = **$500M × 2% = $10M annually**.

#### **3. Wealth Management Fees**

MAIV charges investors an annual management fee based on their assets under management (AUM). This provides a steady, recurring revenue stream.

**Revenue Structure**

* Typical fee range = **1%–2% of AUM**.
* This fee covers platform operations, investor support, and administrative services.

**Example Calculation**

* AUM = **$500M**.
* Average fee = **1.5%**.
* Revenue = **$500M × 1.5% = $7.5M annually**.

#### **4. Profit-Sharing**

Profit-sharing provides an additional upside when projects exceed their expected performance thresholds.

**Revenue Structure**

* Profit-sharing is triggered on project returns above the promised yield (e.g., 20% p.a.).
* The platform retains **10%–30% of excess profits** as a performance bonus.

**Example Calculation**

* Total capital deployed = **$500M**.
* Average yield promised to investors = **15%**.
* Actual average return = **22%**.
* Excess return = **7% of $500M = $35M**.
* Platform’s share (30% of $35M) = **$10.5M annually**.

#### **5. Additional Revenue Streams**

**Platform Licensing (White Label)**

* MAIV charges white-label clients for access to its technology and platform.
* Licensing fee range: **$100,000–$500,000 per client annually**.
* Assume **5 white-label clients**, each paying an average of **$300,000**.
* Revenue = **$1.5M annually**.

**Transaction Fees**

* Small fees per transaction processed through the platform, typically **0.1%–0.5%**.
* Assume total transaction volume = **$1B annually**.
* Average fee = **0.2%**.
* Revenue = **$1B × 0.2% = $2M annually**.

**Cross-Selling and Ancillary Services**

* Additional services like insurance, tax advisory, or investment planning.
* Estimated revenue = **$500,000 annually**.

#### **Total Revenue Summary**

| **Revenue Source**         | **Annual Revenue** |
| -------------------------- | ------------------ |
| **Net Interest Margin**    | $40,000,000        |
| **Upfront Finance Fees**   | $10,000,000        |
| **Wealth Management Fees** | $7,500,000         |
| **Profit Sharing**         | $10,500,000        |
| **Platform Licensing**     | $1,500,000         |
| **Transaction Fees**       | $2,000,000         |
| **Cross-Selling Services** | $500,000           |
| **Total Annual Revenue**   | **$72,000,000**    |

#### **Key Assumptions**

1. Total capital deployment and AUM of $500M annually.
2. White-label client base grows steadily, contributing recurring revenue.
3. Average return on deployed capital allows for sustainable profit-sharing without overly diluting investor returns.
4. Transaction volume and ancillary services provide supplementary but growing revenue streams.

#### **Profitability Potential**

* With a high net margin from the cost of money differential and scalable ancillary revenues, the MAIV project is positioned for significant profitability.
* As AUM and transaction volumes grow, recurring revenue from wealth management and transaction fees will further stabilize earnings.
* White-label services add diversification, reducing dependence on direct investment operations.

This model ensures sustainable, diversified, and scalable revenue for MAIV, enabling long-term growth and market leadership.


---

# Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation

If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter:

```
GET https://maiv.gitbook.io/maiv-finance/overview/revenue-model.md?ask=<question>
```

The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.